Ownership, risk, and FAQs

What you own, who does the work, and what happens if it goes wrong

For more than a decade, ClearSummit has built production software for major corporations and startups. Here is how Leveraged Velocity handles ownership, delivery, term, remedies, access, transition, and the questions that depend on your systems and data.

Finance

What it costs, what the commitment is, and what it takes to be worth it.

What does it cost, and what are we committing to?

The starting prices and one term, published so a budget conversation can happen before a sales conversation.

Automate — $4k per month
Your team does the same work by hand every week. We take it off them, one thing at a time.
Build — $12k per month
You know what needs building — integrations, systems that should talk to each other, the reporting nobody has time to assemble. We work through it.
Guided — $18k per month
You know where the business is stuck. We find the best leverage points with you.
A 90-day initial term, then month to month.
Long enough to plan a quarter, ship against it, and see whether it worked.

What if we need more than one thing moving at once?

Neither of these is a first purchase. The expansion has a published price; the reserved team has a published range and is still quoted per engagement.

A second priority — +$12k per month
An expansion on an account that is already running, reviewed before it starts. Not a first purchase.
Reserved senior team — from $30k per month
Quoted per engagement. Not a first purchase.

Technical review

Whose systems the work happens in, how it reaches production, and where the edges of the engagement are.

Where does the work happen, and how does it reach production?

Your repositories, accounts, and data
We work inside your systems. Repositories, infrastructure, vendor accounts, credentials, and data stay under your control throughout.
Build the right thing
We keep one active priority and the next four weeks visible, then design, build, integrate, and put reviewable software live every week.
Close the loop
We target the first named milestone by day 30, measure usage, diagnose issues, and leave your team with the tools and SOPs to run what we built.

What if we do not have a safe release path yet?

There is no safe release path yet
Building one is legitimate work and it can be the first thing we do. Worth knowing in advance that this is where the early weeks go, so the first evidence looks like a working release process rather than features.

Are you taking over our support queue?

Direct access, not frontline support
Your team keeps the support queue. We work directly with tickets, systems, data, and customers when useful and authorized so we can diagnose and fix the underlying product problem.

What is deliberately not part of the base engagement?

We do not sell hours
You buy an agreed priority and visible output, not a timesheet. That is velocity: the things that matter, done and live.
Parallel work
One priority at a time is the mechanism. If you need more priorities actioned at once, we can add resources.
No fixed outcome under unknown scope
We commit to a plan for the quarter and a named day-30 target. We will not guarantee a delivery date for work nobody has specified yet.

How is AI used, and what stays under a person's control?

AI increases the team's leverage; clients are still buying accountable product judgment and execution. What controls a workflow carries is designed with you. One shape that can take:

Example

  • We define the decision, its source data, the allowed actions, and the cases that must go to a person.
  • We put the model inside the existing workflow with approval steps, exception handling, and an audit trail.
  • We evaluate it against real cases, make failures visible, and document how the operating team reviews and improves it.

Who / What / How

Who you get, what happens if that changes, what we can see, and what is left behind at the end.

What about certifications, insurance, model providers, and where your people sit?

None of that is published here, and the omission is deliberate.

  • That covers certifications and attestations, insurance, where the people on your engagement are, anyone we would work through, which model providers a workflow would use, and whether any of your data would reach one.
  • Every answer depends on which systems and which data are in scope.
  • Send the question — including your own security questionnaire — and it is answered for the engagement being proposed.

Who will we be working with, and what if that changes?

Not an anonymous developer pool
Meet the people proposed for your engagement before you commit. If that team has to change, we tell you before it happens.

What happens when the engagement ends?

Nothing has to be extracted from us. We work inside your systems, and what your team needs in order to keep running the work is part of delivery rather than a separate closing project.

The bespoke work you have paid for
Ownership of the custom deliverables built for you transfers on payment, under the assignment terms in your agreement.
The operating knowledge
Documentation and knowledge transfer are part of delivery. Their scope is set in your agreement rather than promised as a fixed period.
The decision record
Architecture decisions, trade-offs, and deliberate technical debt are written down where your team can find them.

Can we evaluate this without booking a call?

Of course. Prices, terms, boundaries, and fit are all published here.

  • The fit check gives a recommendation on the page, before anyone asks who you are.
  • And if you would rather just talk it through, get in touch and we will set up a call.

Is there anything about you we can check independently?

Yes. Clutch lists 22 client reviews of ClearSummit, each carrying its verification marker, at an overall 5.0 rating.

  • Clutch interviews reviewers directly and publishes the record, so it is a corpus neither of us controls: the reviews name their own projects, sizes, and dates, and most were conducted by phone.
  • Read them with their dates in view. The most recent is from September 2022, so they describe how the work was received, not what the current subscription includes.

If the answers hold up on your side, the remaining question is whether the working model fits your situation.

Check your fit — nine questions